The Golden Mean Is Not Fifty-Fifty

The chapter's central question

Ethical meanness is not the arithmetic average of the two ends, but appropriateness ‘relative to us’. Courage is established when what to fear, the reason for fear, and the time and method are appropriate for the situation. This ability to recognize appropriateness is practical wisdom (phronēsis), and through long-term habit the emotions themselves are trained to respond to good reasons.

Read the complete essay

The flower of Aristotle's ethics is 'Mesotēs'. Many people misunderstand the mean as ‘a vague middle ground that is neither this nor that’ or ‘a gray molecule that always holds back anger and lives comfortably’. However, the mean that Aristotle spoke of is not an arithmetic mean, but the 'pinnacle of excellence (Aretē)', like a violin tuner finding the tension of the strings to produce the most beautiful sound.

For example, let's look at the emotion of fear. Jumping into the enemy's camp without a sword without any fear on the battlefield is not courage, but 'recklessness (excess).' On the other hand, throwing away weapons and running away at the slightest sound of wind is 'cowardice (lack).' Real 'courage (moderation)' is knowing clearly what is truly scary, but moving forward with trembling legs for the values ​​that must be protected.

The same goes for anger. Smiling and enduring even when your parents or children are being unfairly humiliated right in front of you is not meekness, but foolish servility. A person who knows how to be angry at the right person, about the right thing, at the right time, and with the right amount of anger is a person with a truly mature character.

Context and nuance

Aristotle's theory of emotions is scattered in 『Rhetoric』, 『Nicomachean Ethics』, and 『Poetics』. Each of the three works looks at emotions from different perspectives: persuasion, character, and tragedy. What they have in common is that emotions are not just noise, but experiences with a reason and an object that cause us to see and judge the world in a certain way.

Not every action has a middle ground. Aristotle clearly states that something that is wrong in itself, such as a malicious act, cannot be done ‘moderately’. If we misunderstand moderation as always being moderate, we lose our justified anger in the face of injustice. Sometimes the appropriate emotion is very strong, and the criterion of moderation is not intensity but situational accuracy.

Do not oversimplify it this way

There is no need to say that Aristotle knew in advance all the answers to today's psychology. His physiology and social assumptions have limitations of the times. Nevertheless, the way in which emotions were analyzed as events intertwined with physical states, objects, beliefs, and behavioral impulses remains powerful. It is more accurate to find similarities between the insights of the original text and the explanations of modern science, but not to equate them with each other.

Philosophy in life

Have you ever been angry and unable to do anything for the whole day because of the other person's crooked tone of voice, even though it was nothing special?

Step 3: ‘Find the middle ground’ — Ask yourself what is the most dignified ‘proper response’ in this situation between ‘cowardly silence (lack)’ and ‘emotional explosion (excess)’

Primary-source guide

Primary guide: Rhetoric II.1–11, Nicomachean Ethics II, and Poetics 6 and 13–14.

Pathos Editorial · Reviewed 2026-09-12